Skip to main content

State Farm pauses California home insurance sales as wildfire poses risk

State Farm

State Farm will cease new home insurance sales in California, citing the increasing risks of wildfires and soaring construction costs.

The insurance company stopped accepting property and casualty insurance applications in both personal and business lines. 

However, existing auto insurance policies will remain unaffected by this decision.

Read More: Chinese citizens sue Florida over property ban law

The company explained that its subsidiary, State Farm General Insurance Company, made this choice in response to substantial increases in construction costs.

It has surpassed inflation rates, rapidly growing exposure to catastrophic events and the challenging reinsurance market.

Over the past five years, California has experienced an average of more than 7,000 wildfires annually, consuming over 2 million acres, according to data from the governor’s office.

The intensity of these fire seasons is attributed to the climate crisis, as confirmed by scientists and California authorities.

Need Career Advice? Get employment skills advice at all levels of your career

While State Farm prioritizes its short-term financial goals, the California Department of Insurance emphasizes its commitment to protecting consumers, despite the factors influencing State Farm’s decision being beyond the agency’s control. 

Existing State Farm policyholders will not be affected, and no non-renewal notices will be issued due to this development.

State Farm said it would collaborate with the California Department of Insurance and lawmakers to strengthen market capacity within the state. 

It said: “However, it’s necessary to take these actions now to improve the company’s financial strength

The insurance group will continue to evaluate market conditions and adjust accordingly.

Follow us on YouTubeTwitterLinkedIn, and Facebook.

Firearm Safety In Business: Ensuring A Secure Work Environment

Guns and ammo

Ensuring a safe and secure work environment is essential for any business. 

This includes protecting the workplace from potential dangers, such as an armed intruder or active shooter event. 

Having effective policies and procedures in place to deal with firearms can help protect employees and customers alike. 

We will discuss the importance of firearm safety in businesses, what measures employers should take to ensure their workplace remains secure, and how they can be prepared in case of an emergency situation involving a firearm. 

We will also provide tips on how businesses can create a culture of safety that encourages responsible behavior when it comes to handling firearms within the workplace.

By following these guidelines, employers can help prevent unnecessary tragedies while providing peace of mind for everyone involved.

The Importance Of Firearm Safety In Business

Firearm safety within businesses is of critical importance in order to keep employees and customers safe. 

Firearms can be used to commit violent acts, so it’s essential that employers have robust policies in place to ensure safety and security. 

Employers should develop procedures for handling firearms and enforcing firearm regulations in the workplace. 

This includes ensuring that only authorized personnel are allowed to bring firearms into the workplace, and that they are properly stored and monitored. 

Furthermore, employers should also provide training for their staff on firearm safety and emergency procedures in case of an active shooter or other threats involving a weapon.

Getting And Securing Firearms And Ammunition

Firearm safety in the workplace is an important concern for employers and employees alike. 

Ensuring that all staff and customers are safe from potential threats is essential to maintaining a secure work environment. 

To achieve this, employers should take a proactive approach to firearms safety in their business. This includes creating clear policies on handling firearms, as well as properly monitoring and securing firearms and ammunition. 

Employers should also enforce background checks for all staff members who have access to firearms, as well as provide training opportunities for them on proper firearm storage and use.

When it comes to obtaining and storing firearms and bulk ammunition in the workplace, it is important that employers get them from trusted vendors and sellers. 

This will help ensure that the firearms are of good quality and free from any defects or malfunctions. 

Employers should also take steps to make sure that all employees who have access to firearms are properly trained in safe handling and storage. 

Employers should also make sure that the proper background checks are completed for any staff members who are allowed to carry firearms in the workplace.

Creating A Culture Of Safety

In order to create an atmosphere of safety within the workplace, businesses should promote open dialogue around firearm safety among staff members. 

Encouraging an open and honest discussion about firearms can help ensure that everyone is aware of the risks, as well as what they should do in case of an emergency situation. 

Employers should also provide education on responsible firearm ownership and encourage open communication between staff members so that questions or concerns can be addressed quickly. 

This will help create a culture of safety and responsibility within the workplace, which can help reduce the risk of any potential accidents or tragedies.

Firearm safety in the workplace is an important topic that should not be taken lightly. By following these guidelines, employers can create a culture of safety within their business and protect everyone involved from potential threats. 

Taking measures to ensure firearm security and providing education on responsible use can help reduce the risk of any unfortunate accidents and provide peace of mind for everyone in the workplace. 

Preparing For An Emergency Situation Involving Firearms

The risk of firearm-related accidents in the workplace is a very real and frightening possibility. 

It is therefore essential that employers take necessary measures to ensure the safety of their staff, customers, and other visitors.

It is important to create policies and procedures around firearms, such as authorizing specific personnel to bring firearms into the workplace, properly monitoring and storing firearms, and enforcing background checks for those who have access to firearms. 

Furthermore, employers should also provide training on emergency procedures in case of an active shooter or other threats involving a weapon. 

This includes informing staff members on what to do if they encounter a situation where someone is armed, as well as providing safe areas in which employees can hide or shelter in case of an emergency. 

By taking these steps, employers can create a secure work environment and reduce the risk of serious accidents or tragedies. 

Limiting Access

Firearm safety in the workplace is a critical issue and as such, employers must take proactive measures to ensure that all staff and customers are kept out of harm’s way. 

Establishing clear policies on handling firearms, as well as properly monitoring and securing them should be at the top of the list for employers. 

Background checks should also be conducted for all personnel who have access to firearms, and employers should consider limiting the number of individuals with firearm access at any given time. 

Limiting access to firearms will help ensure that only those authorized are handling them, as well as reduce the risk of accidents or misuse. 

Overall, creating and enforcing policies on firearm safety in the workplace is essential for ensuring the safety of everyone involved. 

By promoting an open dialogue on firearm safety, providing education and training opportunities, and limiting access to firearms, employers can create a secure work environment in which staff members feel safe and comfortable. 

With the right policies in place, employers can reduce the risk of unfortunate accidents or tragedies involving firearms. 

Final Thoughts

Firearm safety in the workplace is an important issue that should not be taken lightly. 

By following these guidelines and taking proactive steps to ensure everyone’s security, employers can create a safe work environment for all staff members and customers alike.

It is essential to establish policies on firearm handling, monitor and secure firearms at all times, conduct background checks for personnel with access to firearms, provide training on emergency procedures involving weapons, and limit the number of individuals with firearm access when necessary. 

With proper implementation of these measures, employers can reduce the risk of any potential accidents or tragedies from occurring in their workplace while also providing peace of mind for everyone involved.

The 10 worst white collar crimes in history

US justice

Even though they wear thousand-dollar suits, sit behind expensive desks and make absurd amounts of money, rich businessmen and women can still be criminals and steal your money.

White-collar crime has been taking place for decades and still runs rife in the modern day.

The people on this list are responsible for stealing/losing millions and sometimes even billions of dollars that don’t belong to them.


Michael Milken

First on the list is Michael Milken, who was the head of the high-yield bond department of Drexel Burnham Lambert, which was a large investment banking firm in the USA.

He grew into the public eye for his involvement in popularizing the market for high-yield “junk” bonds.

“Junk” bonds are bonds that have a higher risk of default or other damaging credit events, but generally pay higher profits than actual quality bonds in order to make them attractive to investors.

He was caught after a colleague outed him for making fraudulent transactions such as insider trading and stock manipulation. He was fined $600 million and was sentenced to 10 years in prison in 1989 but served only two.

He was also responsible for Drexel Burnham Lambert filing for bankruptcy in 1990.

He was given a presidential pardon by President Donald Trump in 2020 and has dedicated his life to charitable causes, including prostate cancer research, since leaving prison.

Jerome Kerviel

Kerviel was an ex-employee of Société Générale, which is a big multinational banking and financial services company that is headquartered in Paris.

Kerviel rose to fame in the financial industry in 2008 as a rogue trader, which means he administered trades that were not approved by his employer and “did his own thing.”

However, this went wrong over a three-day period when Kerviel lost his company around $5.5 billion. In 2012, he was sentenced to three years in prison as a result of this crime.

Dennis Kozlowski

Kozlowski was the CEO of Tyco International, which is a security systems company headquartered in the USA.

As the CEO, Kozlowski was well known for his lavish lifestyle and spending habits, including paying a staggering $1 million for a single birthday party.

He was thrown into the public eye in 2005 when he was charged with crimes related to the fact that he received $81 million in unauthorized bonuses from the company, and even used company money to purchase a $30 million New York City apartment.

He ended up serving nearly 10 years in prison and was released in January of 2014.

Nick Leeson

Leeson was a British derivatives trader with Barings Bank, which was the UK’s oldest merchant bank.

When his trades weren’t going well with losses of about $2 million, Leeson made a mistake that would change his life and the UK financial industry forever.

On January 16th, 1995, he bet that the Japanese stock market wouldn’t move that much overnight.

But, in the early hours of January 17th, the Kobe earthquake hit and sent the markets plummeting. He tried to quickly rectify these losses with a couple of increasingly risky trades that didn’t pay off.

By the end, about a month later, Leeson’s losses totaled $1.4 billion, which was twice the available trading capital of the company, which sent it under.

He was sentenced to six and a half years for his crimes and sent to prison in Singapore.

He survived colon cancer and now makes a living as an after-dinner speaker.

Jack Abramoff

Jack Abramoff was originally a college Republican who eventually became a lobbyist.

As a lobbyist, he would wind up being at the center of one of the biggest political corruption scandals in U.S. history.

Abramoff had access to the Bush administration and many other top Republicans and was very powerful in his role. His crimes came to light when he was working on Native American casino gambling interests when it was publicized that he and his partner, Michael Scanlon, overbilled their clients and pocketed the money.

Overall, they charged $85 million for their services, which is much more than it should have been. He was sentenced to a prison term of six years for his part in the scandal in 2006.

Allen Stanford

Stanford was the chairman of his own financial company called the Stanford Financial Group of companies. He was also a prominent financier and professional sports sponsor.

He found himself in some hot water when, in 2009, it was revealed that his entire company was nothing but a Ponzi scheme and was responsible for a huge ongoing fraud involving around $7 billion.

A Ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investment operation where the operator pays returns to its investors from new money brought in by new investors, rather than from profit earned by the operator.

For this horrible crime, he was sentenced to a staggering 110 years in prison.

Charles Ponzi

Speaking of Ponzi schemes, this man is the founder of the term.

Charles Ponzi was an Italian businessman who was made famous for his cons in the USA and Canada.

He promised his clients a 50 percent profit within 45 days, or 100 percent profit within 90 days, by buying discounted postal reply coupons in other countries and selling them back at face value in the United States as a form of arbitrage, which is taking advantage of the price difference between two or more markets.

His scheme ran for about a year and cost his investors about $20 million in 1920, which is a massive $287 million in 2022.

Kenneth Lay

Lay was an American businessman and the CEO of Enron during their monumental scandal and played a leading role in the corruption taking place.

Enron was a public energy company and its crash was one of the biggest scandals of all time. Despite seeming like it was prospering as a company, Enron wasn’t actually doing very well.

In order to hide this fact, it took advantage of lax accounting regulations, tax loopholes, and all sorts of unethical practices. By hiding their true worth, everyone believed the company was doing fantastically and wanted to invest.

But once the truth came out, they lost everything and the company went under. Lay was expected to be sentenced to around 10 years in prison but actually died on a vacation in Colorado a few months before his sentencing in 2006.

Bernie Ebbers

Ebbers is a Canadian businessman who co-founded and was the former CEO of the telecommunications company, WorldCom.

Similar to the Enron scandal, WorldCom was found to have been finagling its numbers to make the company appear more valuable in order to entice investors.

Ebbers himself was a billionaire and was making a killing from his scheming activities.

At the time, this was the largest accounting scandal in US history, as they raised their company’s worth by about $11 billion. For his role in this mess, Ebbers was sentenced to 25 years in prison in 2005.

He died aged 78 in 2020.

Bernie Madoff

Bernie Madoff is well known as the founder of his own Wall Street firm, and also known as a big-time swindler and Ponzi scheme operator.

In fact, Madoff was behind the single biggest financial fraud scandal in U.S history.

His whole operation was nothing but a huge lie and he was able to scam thousands of people out of billions of dollars.

The scam began all the way back in 1991 and he was finally put to trial in 2009.

It is estimated that the final amount missing from client accounts was around $65 billion. As a result, Madoff was sentenced to 150 years in prison, the maximum that was allowed in 2009.

In a letter to his victims, he wrote: “I have left a legacy of shame, as some of my victims have pointed out, to my family and my grandchildren.

“This was something I will live in for the rest of my life. I’m sorry. I know that doesn’t help you.”

Madoff died in prison aged 82.

Follow us on YouTube, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook

Amazon to give term-time-only contracts for UK parents


Amazon is introducing a new contract allowing parents and grandparents working in warehouses to opt for term-time-only employment. 

Under this arrangement, people with children can take six weeks vacation in the summer and two weeks each during Easter and Christmas holidays. 

The Seattle giant believes this move will entice more people to join the workforce.

Read More: Amazon faces federal labor charges over anti-union efforts

But the GMB union, currently challenging Amazon for recognition, argues workers want better wages over increased flexibility.

Neil Travis, Amazon’s regional operations director, said offering term-time-only working stemmed from extensive employee feedback. 

He added workers on this contract would still enjoy full-time benefits. 

Claire McCartney from the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development noted only four percent of employees currently work term-time.

Read More: Amazon Coventry warehouse faces pressure to recognise union

She said: ”With the cost and availability of childcare causing huge challenges for working parents, term-time working is likely to have a positive impact on attraction and retention at a time when organisations are struggling with skills shortages.”

This announcement by Amazon coincides with its battle against the GMB’s bid to become the first trade union in Europe recognized by the company. 

Amazon, which has over 70,000 employees in the UK, has expressed opposition to union recognition and prefers direct communication with its workforce.

Meanwhile, workers at the Amazon Coventry warehouse have been on strike for 16 days, demanding a wage increase to £15 per hour.

The GMB’s senior organizer, Amanda Gearing, noted the benefits of flexible contracts but stressed that improved pay remains the primary concern for employees. 

Need Career Advice? Get employment skills advice at all levels of your career

Amazon countered by asserting its competitive pay rates and recently implemented a 10 percent wage increase.

The GMB has applied for statutory recognition from the Central Arbitration Committee (CAC) and claims that most of the Coventry warehouse workforce, with 800 employees as members, supports union representation.

Regarding union recognition, Mr. Travis refrained from commenting on Amazon’s stance, stating that the company is engaged in the CAC process. 

Amazon could challenge the GMB’s calculations regarding the number of employees in the warehouse, which might influence the CAC’s decision. 

The committee is expected to reach a verdict after several weeks of consideration.

Follow us on YouTubeTwitterLinkedIn, and Facebook.

St Mungo’s homeless charity staff to strike over pay


Workers at homeless charity St Mungo’s are preparing to launch a month-long strike citing a dispute over pay.

Employees represented by the trade union Unite will establish picket lines outside St Mungo’s offices in London, Brighton, Bristol, and Oxford.

The union claims the workers are taking a stand due to a meager pay increase offer of 2.25 percent.

Read More: Eli Lilly to pay $13.5 million in class-action lawsuit over insulin pricing

St Mungo’s argues it cannot afford to meet Unite’s demands and characterizes the strike as “unprecedented and disproportionate.”

The conflict centres on pay for the previous fiscal year, 2021/22.

The charity has already implemented a 1.75 percent salary increase during that period.

Read More: Boohoo founders receive double pay despite missing financial targets

Unite has requested a retrospective and consolidated raise of 10 percent.

St Mungo’s says meeting the union’s demands for both the past and current financial years would amount to a total cost of £9.7 million, rendering the organization financially unviable.

According to St Mungo’s, all eligible staff members have already received an average pay rise of 5.5 percent for the financial year 2022/23, with some also receiving an additional £700 payment to address living costs.

Unite’s General Secretary, Sharon Graham, said charity workers who should be assisting the homeless have reached a breaking point.

Read More: Top brass at Wipro takes pay cut

She criticized management’s offer of a meager 2.25 percent raise, stating that it has backfired significantly.

She said: “Charity workers who should be on the streets helping the homeless have reached breaking point.

“Instead of seizing the initiative to end the dispute, management’s decision to offer a pitiful 2.25% has spectacularly backfired.”

The strike action is scheduled to commence on Tuesday and continue for 28 days, concluding on June 26.

St Mungo’s CEO, Emma Haddad, acknowledged the offers made by the charity thus far constitute a minimum 10 percent increase for employees on the lowest salaries.

Need Career Advice? Get employment skills advice at all levels of your career

She noted that Unite had requested this figure but subsequently voted against it.

Haddad described the four-week strike as unprecedented and disproportionate but affirmed that her door remains open to Unite throughout the strike period.

Follow us on YouTubeTwitterLinkedIn, and Facebook

Citigroup to spin off Mexico business as sale efforts failed


Citigroup is now preparing for an initial public offering (IPO) of its Mexico business, Banamex, after an unsuccessful sale attempt.

The spin-off is expected to be completed in the second half of 2024, followed by a public offering in 2025. 

While the listing destination is yet to be determined, a dual listing in Mexico and the US is a possibility.

Citigroup’s decision to pivot to an IPO comes after a 16-month effort to find a buyer for Banamex. 

Read More: Citigroup raises pay for most of its junior bankers at a time of mass layoffs

CEO Jane Fraser said the shift in strategy was aimed at maximizing the value of Banamex for shareholders and advancing the bank’s goal of simplifying its operations.

Earlier sales talks reportedly collapsed despite attracting interest from potential suitors. 

Citigroup had been discussing selling a significant portion of Banamex to Grupo Mexico for approximately $7 billion. 

However, the negotiations became complicated due to Mexico’s president’s demands to protect workers and the bank’s holdings of Mexican artwork in any transaction.

Citigroup acquired Banamex in 2001 for $12.5 billion, establishing its strong presence in Mexico as the only major US lender with a significant market share. 

Need Career Advice? Get employment skills advice at all levels of your career

Over the years, Banamex faced challenges and lost market share to local competitors. 

With 38,000 employees, 1,300 branches, and millions of retail and pension customers, Banamex will continue to be reported under Citigroup’s results until ownership falls below 50 percent

On a positive note, the shift to an IPO will allow Citigroup to resume a “modest” level of share buybacks starting this quarter, as the previous sale expectations had affected the bank’s capital levels

CEO Jane Fraser has been leading efforts to overhaul Citigroup since assuming her role in March 2021, with the intention of streamlining the bank’s operations and optimizing its performance.

Follow us on YouTubeTwitterLinkedIn, and Facebook.

Regulators to rein in AI systems as concerns mount


Financial regulators are taking steps to ensure companies follow the law when using AI systems like ChatGPT amid growing concerns about their potential risks.

Automated systems and algorithms already play a significant role in determining credit ratings, loan terms, bank fees, and other financial aspects. 

AI also influences hiring practices, housing decisions, and working conditions.

Read More: Meta surges in AI dominance with leaked software

Federal agencies recently issued a joint statement on enforcement, emphasizing using AI to make decisions does not exempt companies from responsibility for the impacts of those decisions. 

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has already imposed fines on banks that mismanaged automated systems.

Flawed algorithms and new technologies have led to wrongful home foreclosures, car repossessions, and lost benefit payments.

Regulators stress there will be no “AI exemptions” regarding consumer protection. 

Read More: Apple limits employee use of ChatGPT over data leak concerns

The CFPB, the Federal Trade Commission, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and the Department of Justice are allocating resources and personnel to address the potential adverse effects of new technologies on consumers’ lives.

Regulators say companies must understand how their AI systems make decisions, and when AI-driven decisions lack transparency, those algorithms should not be used. 

The Fair Credit Reporting Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act require financial providers to explain any adverse credit decisions, which extends to decisions related to housing and employment.

Need Career Advice? Get employment skills advice at all levels of your career

To mitigate risks associated with powerful AI systems, experts suggest establishing standards and forming regulatory agencies to license and oversee the technology. 

While comprehensive AI regulations have yet to emerge in the US, societal concerns have prompted discussions between tech CEOs and policymakers regarding the implications of these tools.

Critics argue agencies should conduct further studies and publish information about AI markets, industry practices, major players, and data usage, similar to how regulators have done with new consumer finance products and technologies in the past.

Publishing such information would enhance transparency and understanding in the rapidly evolving AI ecosystem.

Follow us on YouTubeTwitterLinkedIn, and Facebook.

HSBC to rebrand Silicon Valley Bank UK in a bid to preserve tech-focused operations


HSBC is set to reveal a new name for the technology-focused bank it rescued earlier this year.

According to Sky News, Europe’s largest bank plans to rebrand Silicon Valley Bank UK (SVBUK) as HSBC Innovation Banking.

The announcement of the new identity is expected to coincide with London Tech Week, starting on June 12th.

Read More: HSBC shareholders to vote on spinoff of Asia business

The decision to bring SVBUK under the HSBC brand has raised concerns among some tech entrepreneurs who fear the loss of operational independence that made the subsidiary a distinctive presence in the SME banking market.

HSBC’s CEO, Noel Quinn, has emphasized the importance of preserving the culture of the rescued business, which was acquired for £1 when it was on the brink of insolvency.

The Bank of England orchestrated the deal, with Prime Minister Rishi Sunak also personally involved, reflecting the significance of SVBUK for the UK’s start-up economy.

Read More: HSBC profits up by $1.5 billion after Silicon Valley Bank UK business buyout

SVBUK has a large client base, and its potential collapse had sparked warnings from entrepreneurs about the impact on the UK tech sector.

The recent appointments of three senior figures as directors at HSBC, following the acquisition of the US-owned lender, have signaled the bank’s commitment to the subsidiary.

However, no immediate changes are planned for SVBUK’s executive leadership, with Erin Platts remaining as chief executive and independent chairman Darren Pope expected to stay in place for the time being.

Need Career Advice? Get employment skills advice at all levels of your career

In the US, SVB was temporarily taken into public ownership after a crisis of confidence among depositors.

It was subsequently sold to First Citizens Bancshares, a regional US lender. HSBC’s approval of bonus payments totaling nearly £20 million for SVBUK staff further demonstrated its confidence in the talent base and its commitment to retaining key personnel.

Although SVBUK is a profitable business employing approximately 700 people in Britain, it faced severe challenges due to the difficulties of its American parent company.

HSBC’s rebranding effort aims to signal a new chapter for the subsidiary, aligning it more closely with the HSBC brand and leveraging its expertise in innovation banking.

Follow us on YouTubeTwitterLinkedIn, and Facebook

EU warns Elon Musk of Twitter ban if disinformation rules ignored


Elon Musk has been warned Twitter could face a potential ban in Europe if it fails to follow disinformation rules. 

The warning comes from Jean-Noël Barrot, France’s Digital Minister, who emphasized the importance of following guidelines to combat fake information on social media platforms.

In an interview on France Info, Barrot said: “Disinformation is one of the gravest threats weighing on our democracies.

Read More: Elon Musk accuses Microsoft of improperly using Twitter data

“Twitter, if it repeatedly doesn’t follow our rules, will be banned from the EU.”

This development comes after Twitter withdrew from a voluntary rulebook encompassing guidelines for major tech companies, including Meta, Alphabet, and Microsoft. 

Although participation in this code was not mandatory, it aimed to align with the forthcoming Digital Services Act, which will be enforced in August within the European Union.

Elon Musk has consistently highlighted transparency and freedom of expression as key motivations for acquiring Twitter. 

Need Career Advice? Get employment skills advice at all levels of your career

The billionaire has expressed his intention to serve as a news source and has proposed ideas to combat disinformation. 

One of the measures Musk has introduced is Community Notes, which allows selected Twitter users to add notes providing additional context to specific tweets. 

These notes are visible to all users and help determine the accuracy of the information shared.

Elon Musk has not made any public statements regarding the potential European ban on the platform.

Follow us on YouTubeTwitterLinkedIn, and Facebook.

Senior level exits continue at Wipro


Despite a wave of promotions earlier this year, senior-level departures are continuing at Wipro.

Mohd Haque, the Senior Vice President and Head of Healthcare and Medical Devices for the Americas, as well as Ashish Saxena, the Senior Vice President and Head of the Manufacturing and Hi-Tech Business Unit, have both resigned from the company.

Haque, a seasoned veteran with two decades of experience at Wipro, was responsible for overseeing a team of 21,000 employees and managing various aspects such as profit and loss, sales, strategy, delivery, consulting, and account management.

Read More: India and EU to collaborate on rules and standards for the tech industry

He also spearheaded Wipro Americas’ inclusion and diversity council.

Saxena, who led a billion-dollar business unit, was in charge of developing the strategic roadmap for his segment and driving revenue growth, profit margin, and customer satisfaction. Saxena’s departure comes after almost six years with Wipro.

Gurvinder Sahni, previously the Vice President and Strategic Advisor, left Wipro in April and quickly joined Persistent Systems as their Chief Marketing Officer (CMO).

When approached for comment, Wipro confirmed Mohd Haque would be leaving the company in June, while Ashish Saxena and Gurvinder Sahni departed Wipro to pursue other opportunities. Wipro expressed gratitude for their leadership and contributions.

Read More: Elon Musk indicates India as a potential location for Tesla’s new factory

The significant number of departures at the Vice President and Senior Vice President levels resulted in the promotion of other employees to these positions.

In January, Wipro announced the promotion of a record-breaking 70 senior executives to these ranks.

Other notable recent departures include Rajan Kohli, who served as President of Wipro’s Integrated Digital, Engineering, and Application Services business line. Kohli had been with Wipro for nearly three decades before joining CitiusTech as CEO in April.

Need Career Advice? Get employment skills advice at all levels of your career

Angan Guha, who oversaw a diverse portfolio encompassing financial services, manufacturing, energy and utilities, hi-tech, and Canadian operations, left Wipro in late 2022.

Guha is now the CEO and Managing Director of Pune-based Birlasoft. In addition, Sanjeev Singh, the former Chief Operating Officer at Wipro, resigned in January and assumed the role of CEO and Managing Director at CMS IT Services.

Follow us on YouTubeTwitterLinkedIn, and Facebook

Skip to content