A proposal before Congress, the Halting International Relocation of Employment (HIRE) Act 2025, has stirred a storm across the technology and business-services sectors. The bill aims to tighten the link between U.S. tax policy and domestic job creation by penalizing certain forms of outsourcing.
The draft law would introduce a 25% excise tax on payments U.S. companies make to foreign workers if the services are consumed inside the United States. On top of that, those payments would become non-deductible for tax purposes, significantly raising the cost of offshoring common back-office, customer-support, and IT tasks.
Supporters of the measure argue that outsourcing has too often hollowed out local employment, particularly in areas like tech support, payroll, and software maintenance. By taxing these transactions, lawmakers hope to encourage businesses to bring more work home, strengthening wages and rebuilding the mid-skill workforce.
New US Bill Could Disrupt Indian Tech’s Outsourcing Model
As policy shifts threaten to reshape outsourcing, businesses must rethink their hiring strategies. Post your job on WhatJobs today and connect directly with skilled talent worldwide — free for 30 days.
Post a Job Free for 30 Days →Indian IT service providers are watching nervously. Giants such as Infosys, Wipro, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), and HCL earn much of their revenue from American contracts. Analysts warn that even a partial loss of their U.S. client base could reduce margins and prompt layoffs in delivery centers abroad. Smaller outsourcing firms could be even more exposed.
From the U.S. perspective, the HIRE Act could trigger a strategic rethink. Companies may decide to:
- Repatriate some technical support or development jobs.
- Expand apprenticeship and reskilling programs so current staff can cover work once sent overseas.
- Negotiate hybrid models where overseas teams handle only the most specialized tasks.
Business groups caution that the proposal may have unintended consequences. They argue that U.S. firms depend on global labor to remain competitive and that extra taxes might slow innovation or push up prices for consumers. Legal experts also note the bill would require careful rules to distinguish which services are “consumed in the U.S.” and to prevent double taxation on multinational projects.
For now, the legislation is at an early stage in the House and Senate. Hearings are expected later this fall, and amendments could soften its reach or narrow the affected sectors. But the discussion itself signals a new willingness in Washington to scrutinize how corporate tax treatment shapes hiring choices.
Economists say the outcome could shape how fast U.S. tech and back-office roles grow over the next decade. If firms adjust by developing local talent pools, wages for mid-level coders, support engineers, and data-entry specialists may rise. However, if compliance becomes too burdensome, some employers could scale back services entirely or automate tasks instead of hiring either locally or overseas.
FAQs
Q1: What exactly is the HIRE Act 2025?
It is a congressional proposal that would apply a 25% tax to payments for services performed by foreign workers when the benefit is used in the United States, while also denying a deduction for those costs.
Q2: Which companies would feel the biggest impact?
Firms in tech, finance, customer support, and shared-service centers that outsource large amounts of work to countries like India, the Philippines, or Eastern Europe.
Q3: How might this bill influence hiring in the U.S.?
Employers might shift routine programming, help-desk, and payroll tasks back onshore, invest in training U.S. workers, or contract with domestic vendors rather than foreign suppliers.
Q4: Is the HIRE Act close to becoming law?
Not yet. It is still in committee discussions and will likely face revisions, debate, and potential industry lobbying before any vote.
Case In point
Raj, a software engineer in Ohio, currently coordinates with a vendor team based in Bangalore. Under today’s arrangement, much of the testing and bug-fixing is done abroad. If the HIRE Act were enacted, Raj’s employer could face an extra tax on that contract. Rather than absorb the cost, management might bring more of the quality-assurance work in-house. Raj would then have a chance to broaden his skills, mentor junior hires, and play a larger role in keeping projects on schedule.
