Trump’s $559 Billion “One Big Beautiful Bill” Could Reshape America’s Energy Future — But At What Cost?

The newly signed law shifts hundreds of billions from clean energy to fossil fuels, sparking concerns about jobs, prices, and America’s role in the global energy race.

A $559 Billion Energy Shift

On July 4, 2025, President Donald Trump signed into law the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, a sweeping piece of legislation that supporters claim will strengthen U.S. energy independence. Yet critics warn it could do the opposite, pulling investment away from clean energy, raising consumer costs, and pushing jobs overseas.

The numbers are staggering. The law redirects $559 billion away from renewable energy support over the next decade, while expanding fossil fuel subsidies that already exceed $20 billion annually. That shift could fundamentally change where America invests its energy dollars, with far-reaching consequences for workers, households, and U.S. competitiveness abroad.

The Jobs at Stake

The law comes at a time when the U.S. clean energy workforce has grown dramatically. 3.5 million Americans work in renewable energy, representing 42% of all energy jobs nationwide. By contrast, coal employs just 42,000 workers.

Solar alone supports nearly seven times as many jobs as coal. Yet while solar, wind, and battery industries face looming subsidy cuts and restrictive rules on foreign components, coal has been newly designated as a “critical mineral,” qualifying for fresh tax credits and streamlined permitting.

The Solar Energy Industries Association estimates that 330,000 clean energy jobs could vanish by 2030 as a result of the bill. Already, more than $22 billion worth of renewable energy projects have been cancelled since Trump returned to office, including a $2.6 billion battery plant in Georgia and a $1.2 billion facility in Arizona.

Deadlines That Hit Consumers Hard

For everyday Americans, the impact shows up in their wallets:

• Electric vehicles (EVs): The $7,500 tax credit for new EVs and $4,000 for used EVs expires September 30, 2025. After that, electric cars will instantly become more expensive.
• Home solar: The 30% tax credit for rooftop solar installations ends December 31, 2025. On a typical $20,000 system, that’s a $6,000 discount gone. Installers are already booked solid leading up to the deadline.
• Utility bills: Without renewables, U.S. electricity prices could become more volatile. Unlike fossil fuels, solar and wind don’t rely on fuel markets, which historically cause sharp price spikes during supply disruptions.

“These deadlines aren’t far-off hypotheticals — they’re less than 18 months away,” said energy analyst Matt Ferrell in his breakdown of the bill. “For consumers, it means higher costs. For workers, it means fewer jobs.”

The Foreign Entity Trap

Another major feature of the bill is its “Foreign Entity of Concern” restrictions. Any renewable project that uses components from China, Russia, Iran, or North Korea will lose eligibility for tax credits.

On paper, the goal is to reduce dependence on China, which dominates global supply chains. But in practice, it may paralyze projects altogether.

• China produces 80% of the world’s solar panels and 77% of all batteries.
• U.S. domestic manufacturing isn’t yet capable of replacing those imports.
• Without transitional support, the law effectively bans key inputs before U.S. factories can scale up.

“It’s like banning flour and then wondering why the bakery is closed,” Ferrell explained.

Fossil Fuels Favored

While renewables face tighter rules, fossil fuels are getting new lifelines:

• Oil & Gas: The law mandates 30 offshore drilling lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico and 15 in Alaska (including 4 in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge) by 2035.
• Coal: Now classified as a “critical mineral,” coal qualifies for production tax credits.
• Subsidies: Oil companies regain full deductions for intangible drilling costs and reduced royalty rates, benefits they’ve enjoyed for decades.

In short, the bill doesn’t eliminate subsidies — it reallocates them. Nuclear and carbon capture projects remain protected, while solar and wind lose out.

Economic Reality Check

Supporters argue that the law protects U.S. energy independence and shields against Chinese supply dominance. Critics say it’s an economic own goal.

Here’s why:

• Returns on investment: Research shows renewable subsidies generate 3–4 times more economic activity per dollar compared to fossil fuel subsidies.
• Healthcare costs: Air pollution from fossil fuels costs Americans $820 billion annually in medical expenses — about $2,500 per person.
• Private capital unlocked: Each federal dollar invested in renewables historically attracts $5 in private investment. Between 2004 and 2022, tax credits helped trigger $695 billion in private spending.

In contrast, fossil fuel subsidies often fund activities that companies would pursue anyway. As Ferrell put it: “It’s like tipping your landlord for collecting rent.”

Global Consequences

While the U.S. pulls back, rivals are charging ahead:

• China: Invested $940 billion in clean energy in 2024 — nearly triple U.S. levels. By 2030, it will account for 60% of global renewable capacity additions.
• Europe: Added 80 GW of renewable energy in 2023 and is offering new incentives to attract U.S. scientists.
• India: Targeting 500 GW of renewable capacity by 2030.

The contrast is striking. Renewable energy now makes up 10% of China’s GDP, positioning Beijing to dominate the world’s fastest-growing industry. Meanwhile, U.S. researchers are leaving. A Nature survey found 75% of U.S.-based clean energy scientists are considering moving abroad.

“This is brain drain for America, brain gain for everyone else,” Ferrell warned.

Sponsor Segment: Surfshark VPN

While navigating these complex energy shifts, personal security also matters. As Ferrell notes, he relies on Surfshark VPN to protect his data when traveling. Surfshark allows unlimited devices under one account, blocks data breaches, and even helps unlock location-gated services.

They’re currently offering 4 free months with code UNDECIDED at checkout. The VPN comes with a 30-day money-back guarantee, making it risk-free to try.

The Bigger Picture

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act isn’t just an energy policy. It’s a pivot point in America’s economic strategy. By cutting $559 billion from renewables, the U.S. risks:

• Losing leadership in the fastest-growing global industry.
• Sacrificing job creation in favor of legacy sectors.
• Increasing costs for consumers through higher EV and solar prices.
• Creating dependencies as foreign nations set the future’s technology standards.

As Ferrell put it: “We’re protecting the energy equivalent of BlackBerry while the iPhone of energy takes over the world.”

FAQs

Bottom line:

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act shifts America’s energy focus backward, away from renewables and toward fossil fuels. For workers, consumers, and global competitiveness, the costs could be steep.