Republican Senator Rick Scott has grilled Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger over plans to cut over 15,000 jobs, despite being set to receive nearly $20 billion in grants and loans to boost chip production.
In a letter obtained by Reuters, Scott questioned the Commerce Department’s planned financial awards.
He asked whether they failed to include robust criteria to ensure taxpayer funds were only allocated to companies meeting standards for US manufacturing and job creation.
In May, the Commerce Department announced a preliminary agreement to provide Intel with $8.5 billion in grants. This could rise to $11 billion in loans, and access to a 25% investment tax credit. The finalization of these awards is still pending. The Commerce Department previously stated the funding would support the creation of more than 10,000 manufacturing jobs. It will also create nearly 20,000 construction jobs across projects in Arizona, New Mexico, Ohio, and Oregon.
Intel Job Cuts
Earlier this month, Intel announced plans to cut $10 billion in costs by 2025, including reducing its workforce by over 15%.
Gelsinger said Intel’s workforce is currently 10% larger than it was in 2020. At the time the company’s revenue was $24 billion higher than in 2023. He stressed a need to reduce headcount at headquarters while increasing support for customers in the field.
Senator Scott is seeking clarity on how many US employees will be affected by these job cuts. He also wants to know whether these reductions will impact Intel’s planned semiconductor manufacturing investments.
He asks:
“What is Intel trying to achieve with these job cuts, and why have billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars in investments not been sufficient to prevent these layoffs?”
The department declined to comment on Scott’s letter, and Intel has not yet responded to requests for comment.
The CHIPS Act and Intel’s Federal Funding
Boosting U.S. Semiconductor Production
The CHIPS Act was introduced as a strategic initiative to revitalize the U.S. semiconductor industry. The sector is critical to national security and economic competitiveness.
The legislation allocates $52 billion to incentivize companies like Intel to expand chip manufacturing within the United States. This reduces dependence on imports and addressing supply chain vulnerabilities.
Intel, one of the world’s largest semiconductor manufacturers, has been a significant beneficiary of this funding.
The company announced plans to build new manufacturing facilities in Ohio and Arizona. These projects were touted as major job creators.
However, recent reports of impending job cuts have led to questions about the company’s commitment to its workforce and the broader goals of the CHIPS Act.
Job Cuts Amid Federal Support
Intel’s plans to reduce its workforce come as the company navigates a challenging business environment, marked by declining demand for personal computers and other electronic devices.
The company has indicated that the job cuts are part of a broader effort to streamline operations and reduce costs as it adapts to changing market conditions.
However, the timing of the layoffs, so soon after receiving federal funds, has sparked a backlash from some lawmakers.
Need Career Advice? Get employment skills advice at all levels of your career
The Broader Debate on Corporate Responsibility
The situation with Intel highlights a broader debate about the responsibilities of corporations that receive government support.
Federal funding can be a powerful tool for driving economic growth and innovation. However, it also raises questions about how to ensure that companies are held accountable for delivering on their promises.
Critics argue without clear conditions and oversight, companies may prioritize short-term financial gains over long-term investments in their workforce and the broader economy.
This has led to calls for stronger enforcement mechanisms to ensure that federal dollars are used in ways that benefit workers and communities.
Intel’s Response and Future Implications
Navigating Economic Challenges
Intel has defended its decision to restructure its workforce. It says the job cuts are necessary to remain competitive in a rapidly changing market.
The company has emphasized its commitment to expanding U.S. chip manufacturing and contributing to the goals of the CHIPS Act. However, it stresses the need to adapt to market realities.
As Intel moves forward with its plans, the company will need to balance the demands of its shareholders, employees, and lawmakers.
How Intel navigates this complex landscape could have significant implications for its reputation and its relationship with the federal government.
The Path Forward
The outcome of this situation could influence how future federal funding programs are structured and monitored.
It could be the case companies like Intel are seen as not delivering on the promises associated with government incentives. This could lead to stricter conditions on funding and enhance oversight.
The company’s actions in the coming months will be closely watched by both industry stakeholders and policymakers.
